Islamic Terrorism in India

Most Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslims

Anwar Shaikh:- Mohammed himself was a terrorist

Posted by jagoindia on February 8, 2009


Anwar Shaikh on Islamic terror by Koenraad Elst

The answer, Mr. Sheikh argues, is quite straightforward: Mohammed himself was a terrorist, the most authoritative precedent for contemporary Islamic terrorists. To prove his point, he presents long lists of quotations from the Quran, the better-known Hadith (traditions of the Prophet) and also some lesser-known Hadith. In this respect, his book is a treasure-trove of first-hand data on the foundations of Islam and its doctrine of Holy War ( Jihad ).

Numerous canonical statements affirm that the Mujahid or Holy Warrior undoubtedly counts as the best among Muslims, e.g.: “Acting as Allah’s soldier for one night in a battlefield is superior to saying prayers at home for 2,000 years.” (from Ibn-e-Majah , vol.2, p.162) Or: “Leaving for Jihad in the way of Allah in the morning or evening will merit a reward better than the world and all that is in it.” (from Muslim , 4639) Jihad, while not a duty for every individual Muslim, is a duty on the Muslim community as a whole until the whole world has become part of the Islamic empire.

The cult of martyrdom is an intrinsic part of the doctrine of jihad: the martyr “will desire to return to this world and be killed ten times for the sake of the great honour that has been bestowed upon him.” (Muslim 4635) And from Allah’s own mouth: “Count not those who were slain in God’s way as dead, but rather living with their Lord, by Him provided, rejoicing in the bounty that God has given them.” (Quran 3:163) Contrary to a recent tongue-in-cheek theory which reduces the heavenly reward for the fallen Mujahid from 72 maidens to mere grapes on the basis of some Arabic-Aramaic homonymy, a number of Prophetic sayings, in varied wordings mostly not susceptible to this cute Aramaic interpretation, confirm the traditional belief that “the martyr is dressed in radiant robes of faith, he is married to houris (the paradisiac virgins)” etc. (Ibn-e-Majah, vol.2, p.174) This confirms that the suicide terrorists were not acting against Islamic tenets, as some soft-brained would-be experts in the media have claimed. On the contrary, to sacrifice one’s life in a jihadic operation against the unbelievers is the most glorious thing a Muslim can do.

In Jihad, it is perfectly permitted to deceive the unbelievers and subject them to terror. Anwar Sheikh provides all the scriptural references plus many precedents from history, which we cannot reproduce here. Suffice it to say there is ample evidence that Islam permits, and that by his personal example or by that of the men under his command, Mohammed has given permission for abduction, extortion, rape of hostages, mass-murder of prisoners, assassinations of enemies and dissidents, breaking of the conventions of civilized warfare, breaking of treaties, and suicide missions. From Osama bin Laden to the murderers of children in Beslan, North Ossetia, the Islamic terrorists are faithful followers of the Prophet.

Read  more here: Anwar Shaikh on Islamic terror by Koenraad Elst

10 Responses to “Anwar Shaikh:- Mohammed himself was a terrorist”

  1. It is useless to argue with you.
    Mohammad was the greatest man of man kind
    Alas you don’t understand

  2. Vinod said

    @ Yasir
    You are obviously blinded and brainwashed by your islamic upbringing. so much so that you can’t see the fact that ‘prophet’ Mo was a very evil man and Islam is nothing more than a demonic sect

  3. beena said

    Its impossible to change hypnotised and radicalised Muslims like Yasir Imran.

  4. Mahendra said

    Yasir, a great man is one who preaches that all humans are created by God and their actions for the good of the world determine their future and that they should exercise moderation in their lives. Mohammed preached that all who do not follow Islam will go to hell, he and his followers have done immense destruction to the world and he married ten women including a child and his own daughter-in-law. Just think, reflect and become an ex-Muslim.

  5. Pankaj said

    dharmaveer’s blog talks about this – pl. visit that one. He has given many quotes from Hadiths which show Muhammad doing the worst type of things.

  6. Noname said

    Mahendra, its tuf to point things out coz i know u ll b hardly reading this reply but to understand Islam read sura 2:62. google it to taste true islam.
    Ur post is full of wrong info(i m not calling u lier,u speak what was told to u).plz chk facts b4 commenting on a man who has a flollower of 40% of world’s ppulation.

  7. jagoindia said

    Why do jokers like you infest this blog? Islam = Terror. There is nothing called radical or extreme Islam. There is only one Islam and that is equal to terrorism and fascism and has to be rooted out.

  8. Salman said

    U hindus only after learning one sentence of hadees which is not explained properly can’t call him terrorist.We cannot take your words because in the list of 100 most influential persons muhammad is the first written by a christian and jesus is third and there is no place for your any of the gods in the hundred.This means they have done nothing good.And for you to call that our prophet provoked jihad.Then why did these bloody battles like mahabharata occured.
    First go and read your gita and then u will understand.

  9. Murali Mohan said

    Dear Sir Anwar Shaik,

    I agree with you, yours view is cent per cent true and appreciate yours candid and unbiased opinion. May God bless you.

  10. Abdul Qureshi said

    Dear Salman,

    Salaam-ali-kum,

    Don’t get biased you are comparing Muhammed (I won’t call him Prophet)with Gods of Spiritual Religion Hinduism, it is yours ignorance you cannot do it Gods are highly ethical and moral divine entities of celestial bodies but Muhammed was a human beingb with flesh and blood with lot of illicit cravings.

    I have read Gita there was a battle among righteousness to wrong doers but it was exactly reverse in case of Muhammed he killed people for his own cravings and selfishness.

    The ignorant like you having dimwit and a knowledge with a inch depth can argue like this after all 100 influential persons list prepared by whom ? they have just analyzed based on followers but they may not be correct. In Muhammed’s case he was a great thug and lustful that you cannot deny go and read his life history his Allah is his brain child and Qu’ran is his own view to give some weightage he lied it an his brain child Allah. Be unbiased and get knowledge otherwise you will become one more foolish follower who are once again born on on this earth in the gut of a pig, dog, cat, prostitutes, and as germs and worms to avoid this hell follow truth given farly in Bhagavad Gita by Lord Shri Krishna The Great Prophet of this Universe – The peerless Master of Spiritual Truth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: