Islamic Terrorism in India

Most Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslims

LeT’s true goal is not Kashmir, it is India

Posted by jagoindia on March 23, 2010

India, not Kashmir, is Lashkar’s true goal: US congressman
PTI, Mar 13, 2010,

WASHINGTON: A resolution of Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan would no longer satisfy Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and the terrorist outfit responsible for 26/11 and attack on Indian Parliament would continue to pose a serious threat to both India and the western world in particular the US, top experts have told American lawmakers.

“There is no doubt in my mind that we have to find ways to resolve the issues relating to Kashmir. But I think resolving Kashmir is not going to solve the problems relating to LeT,” Ashley J Tellis, senior associate at the prestigious Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told US lawmakers at a Congressional hearing on Thursday.

“Resolving the Kashmir problem by itself is not going to remove this threat because the aim of these groups is to leverage themselves into a position of power inside Pakistan and to take control,” said eminent Pakistani scholar, Shuza Nawaz, Director, South Asia Centre, the Atlantic Council of the United States.

Both Nawaz and Tellis were responding to concerns of the US Congressmen at the hearing if LeT would abandon terrorism if Kashmir dispute was resolved; given that Lashkar was initially popped up by the ISI of Pakistan for the specific purpose of targeting Kashmir and India in particular.

“I always find it interesting that the people conducting the murder and mayhem (in the Valley) today are not Kashmiri. The people who actually are deprived of all their political rights, they are not conducting the murder and mayhem,” Tellis said.

“The murder and mayhem is being conducted by groups that have absolutely no connections to Kashmir. To my mind that is story, the fact that this is a group that has operations in 21 countries, that has an ideology that is completely anti-western, that is opposed to modernity and secularism and all the kinds of values that we take for granted. This group is not going to be satisfied by dealing with the issue of Kashmir,” Tellis said.

Testifying before the same committee, Lisa Curtis of the Heritage Foundation, referred to the Musharraf formula on resolving the Kashmir dispute; which the then Pakistani President made in a statement in December 2006.

“He (Musharraf) made a very important statement in December of 2006, where he said Pakistan would be willing to give up its claim on Kashmir if four things happen. He said, if the Line of Control that divides Kashmir was made irrelevant, which means people could freely pass back and forth could pass back and forth,” said Curtis, who is known as an American authority on South Asia.

“Two, (Musharraf said) if Kashmir was given greater autonomy. Three, if both sides could figure out a joint mechanism to interact, to have the two sides of Kashmir, Pakistani Kashmir and Indian Kashmir interact. So he made a very forward looking proposal. And as we know by Steve Coll, who wrote about this in the New Yorker Magazine not too long ago, they were very close to coming to some kind of agreement or understanding on Kashmir,” Curtis said.

Except for Congressmen Dan Burton tended to agree with the observations made by these eminent experts. Burton, who is well-known for his anti-India approach at the Congress, believed otherwise.

“I wish all of the experts and the people in the governments involved, as well as the US would make as their number one goal resolving the issues that have been prevailing for a long, long time. And that is resolving the issue of Kashmir,” he argued.

“I think the only way to do that is to get the Pakistani government and the India government and the people in Kashmir together and resolve some way for them to solve that problem in Kashmir that’s been existing since 1948. Until you get that done, you’re not going to solve this problem.

India can’t attack Pakistan because if they do, Pakistan’s got the ability to retaliate with a nuclear weapon and vice versa. So the killing’s going to go on and the festering that’s created from this impasse is just going to grow,” he said.

Noted Pakistani scholar Shuja Nawaz said, “LeT represents — a word that’s been used often — a Frankenstein’s monster created for the purpose of assisting the Kashmiri freedom movement but that ended up becoming a powerful Sunni Punjabi movement with an independent agenda that appears to have taken on a broader regional role.”

It was born out of the US-backed Afghan jihad against the Soviets, and built on the training provided by that war to Punjabi fighters who could then inculcate Kashmiri fighters in their ways.

Successive civil and military leaders of Pakistan supported the movement as a strategic asset to counter a powerful India to the East and to force it to negotiate for a settlement of the disputed territory by waging a war of, quote, “a thousand cuts”, he told the lawmakers.

“Over time, however, the sponsored organisation took a life of its own, finding the economically disadvantaged area of Central and Southern Punjab to be a fertile territory for recruitment of Jihadi warriors,” he said over time, the ISI began losing its control as the LeT became self sufficient.

“But the realisation that the LeT had become autonomous was slow in being understood or accepted in the ISI and by the military leadership of Pakistan under General Pervez Musharraf,” he said.

“General Musharraf did make an effort to lower the political temperature in Kashmir and began distancing the state from the LeT. However, the process was not handled as well as it could have.

Similar to the disbanding of the Iraqi army after the US invasion when thousands of trained soldiers and officers were let go, the LeT was cut loose without a comprehensive plan to disarm, re-train, and gainfully employ the fighters.”

A dangerous corollary was the induction into the militancy of some former members of the military who had trained and guided them in their war in Kashmir, Nawaz said.

Congressman Gary Ackerman said there is a temptation to think that the LeT is really India’s problem, that the LeT is just interested in the so-called “liberation” of Jammu and Kashmir.

“While it’s true that the primary area of operations for the LeT has historically been the Kashmir Valley and the Jammu region, the LeT has also undertaken repeated and numerous mass casualty attacks throughout India and, in particular, directed at the Indian government. But the idea that this group can be appeased on the subject of Kashmir is dangerous nonsense,” he said.

“The LeT’s true goal is not Kashmir, it is India. And the LeT is not shy about announcing that its intention is to establish an Islamic state in all South Asia. Neither does it hide or try to play down its declaration of war against all Hindus and Jews, who they insist are “enemies of Islam”, Ackerman said.

One Response to “LeT’s true goal is not Kashmir, it is India”

  1. Dr. O. P. Sudrania said

    US/UK created the Al Qaeda and Taliban in Afghanistan to pay back the then USSR, their Vietnam -an unpalatable humiliating defeat ended by President Richard Nixon in 1975. This was a tacitly laid trap in the regime of President Jimmy Carter in July 1979 (unofficially), though officially they put this date in December 1979 or Jan 1980; i.e. after the invasion by USSR in Afghanistan.

    USA fought Vietnam for 21 yrs but sustained them. USSR fought it for about 10 yrs and fractured. But the US is now getting its rebuff since December 2001, resulting in a worst economic disaster
    of the new millenium or the century or the decade as you like to put it. US has not yet waken up to the challenge of this Trojan Horse. Our ‘Hubris’ is our greatest enemy.

    Let us confer from an inerview of Mr Zbigniew Brzezinski(ZB), who was the National Security cum Foreign Policy Advisor to President Carter and now back with President Obama in the same capacity. Let us hear in the words of ZB in that interview:

    Q- And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?

    ZB- What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred Moslems(sic) or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war? The entire interview can be tracked at the following links:

    The first document is French and second one was an Iranian, both translated in English.

    Now ZB must be feeling sorry for himself and bitting his tongue for having said it so proudly. The same Frankenstien’s Monster they created is now ready to extinguish them too, as it did to USSR in 1991. US was happy and sleeping comfortably in her ‘Victory Slumber’ till 9/11, so long as this Monster was bitting the India and Kashmir. Because they thought that they will be able to replace USSR in this region by ridding this Trojan Horse. Alas, US itself may be writing its own obituary long before this Monster is now either dead or engulfs.

    I would be compelled to compare the US and the Islamic Terrorists in the same scale as Geert Wilders has compared the Quran with the Mien Kamft of Hitler. If you look at it carefully, “After all, what is the difference? Not much, in my opinion”. It is a matter of ‘mens rea’. The one who aids and abets is no less guilty.

    So the history is repeating itself, as it always does in the style of Newtonian Law.

    Dr. O. P. Sudrania

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: