Islamic Terrorism in India

Most Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslims

Archive for the ‘Amarnath’ Category

Three Muslims appointed to Amarnath panel, samiti objects

Posted by jagoindia on June 23, 2009


Samiti objects to three Muslims on Amarnath panel
Ishfaq-ul-Hassan / DNA Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Srinagar: Jammu and Kashmir governor NN Vohra has appointed three Muslims to the 13-member Shri Amarnath Yatra Advisory Committee for a smooth conduction of the yatra. But the committee is yet to meet, as the Shri Amarnath Sangharsh Samiti (SASS) has objected to inclusion of Muslims in the committee.

The samiti, which spearheaded the agitation for restoration of 39.88 hectares of forestland to the board last year, called the move “undesirable and unnecessary”. “The SASB Act clearly states that if a governor is non-Hindu, he has to nominate a Hindu to head the board. Taking it as a premise, how can a non-Hindu be part of Hindu religious body? Similarly no non-Muslim should be part of Muslim body,” said samiti convener Brig (retd) Suchet Singh.

This is the first time that the governor, who is also the board chairman, has nominated Muslims to the committee ever since the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board (SASB) Act was passed.

The three Muslims are namely Lateef Ahmad Bhat, Mohammed Jabbar Malik and Dr Mubeen Shah.

Lateef Ahmad Bhat heads the Kashmir Hotel and Restaurants Owners Federation while Dr Mubeen Shah is the chairman of the Kashmir Chamber of Commerce and Industries (KCCI). Mohammed Jabbar Malik represents the family of Buta Malik, a Muslim shepherd from Pahalgam credited with discovering the cave shrine in the mountains in 1850. Buta and his family were the shrine’s custodian till 2000 when the National Conference government formed the shrine board.

“We are looking forward to put across our views for conduct of the yatra. There have been no meetings of the committee so far,” said Dr Mubeen Shah, a member of the coordination committee that spearheaded the struggle against the economic blockade of Kashmir by radical elements in Jammu.

“There has been no meeting of the committee so far. We have heard that some people have raised objections in Jammu over our inclusion in the committee,” said Lateef.

The board’s additional CEO, Madan Mantoo, said the advisory committee members have met the divisional commissioner though there has been no formal meeting with the Board.

Posted in Amarnath, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State | 1 Comment »

Govt provides shocking 700 crores Haj subsidy to Muslims in 2008, but a mere 40 acres not available for Amarnath Hindu pilgrims

Posted by jagoindia on October 27, 2008


Hindus are being taxed 700 crores for Muslim pilgrimage. But what a ruckus the Muslim in Kashmir created for 40 acres for Hindu pilgrims.  Compare Facilities at Amarnath vs. Haj: An Analysis. or video: haj pilgrims versus amarnath pilgrim

The total cost of Haj Operations in 2008 is estimated to be around Rs.847 crores. With the pilgrims fare remaining at Rs.12,000, an amount of Rs.147 crores will be received from the pilgrims. The subsidy will be around Rs.700 crores for Haj 2008 operations. Here is the source

The Indian government has deputed five senior government officers as coordinators, 135 doctors, 146 paramedics, 51 assistant Haj officers and 171 Haj assistants to take care of the pilgrims. source

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-news/record-168000-indians-to-go-for-haj-this-year_100112030.html
Record 168,000 Indians to go for Haj this year
October 27th, 2008 – 2:56 pm ICT by IANS –
Dubai, Oct 27 (IANS) The Indian consulate in Jeddah is gearing up its resources to receive a record 168,000 Indians coming for the Haj pilgrimage this year.India’s Consul General in Jeddah Sayeed Ahmed Baba told the local media that of the around 168,000 pilgrims, 123,211 would come through the Haj committee, while the rest would come through private tour operators.

“The first flight of Indian pilgrims will arrive in Saudi Arabia Oct 30. The Indian mission is fully geared to provide them with the best possible services,” Baba was quoted as saying.

He added that Indian pilgrims would be flying in on Air India and Saudi Arabian Airlines flights from 17 Indian cities.

The Indian government has deputed five senior government officers as coordinators, 135 doctors, 146 paramedics, 51 assistant Haj officers and 171 Haj assistants to take care of the pilgrims.

The consul general said his mission has been able to arrange accommodation for all pilgrims from India within the traditional boundaries of Mina.

While 51,171 Indian pilgrims will stay in the vicinity of Haram, 31,422 will be put up in Aziziyah.

Hai Al-Hijra, a new area, will accommodate 12,876 pilgrims.

Dawar Khudai will accommodate 9,522 pilgrims, Shisha 9,426 in Shisha Nuzha 460.

On an average, 12 flights daily would be carrying about 3,600 pilgrims per day till Dec 2 from the following embarkation points in India: Ahmedabad, Aurangabad, Bangalore, Bhopal, Chennai, Delhi, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Indore, Jaipur, Kolkata, Kozhikode, Lucknow, Mumbai, Nagpur, Srinagar, and Varanasi.

Last year, 157,000 Haj pilgrims came from India to Saudi Arabia.

Posted in Amarnath, Appeasement, Haj, Hindus, Indian Muslims, Islamofascism, Kashmir, Pseudo secularism, State | 7 Comments »

Appeasement is never good for a nation

Posted by jagoindia on August 28, 2008


Appeasement is never good for a nation
Lalit Koul, August 06, 2008
10,000 forest trees are chopped down to build the Mughal road in Kashmir. No one makes a noise.
Acres of land in the Kashmir valley are given to install mobile phone towers. No one screams.
Acres and acres of land in the Kashmir valley are allotted to lay sewage and drinking water pipes. No one objects.

But when 40 hectares of uninhabitable land is handed over to the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board to provide better facilities to the Amarnath Yatra [Images] pilgrims, all hell breaks loose.

Why? Because the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board caters to Hindu pilgrims who want to visit the Amarnath shrine in the valley of Kashmir. It is as simple as that.

Politically correct politicians, policy-makers and administrators might try to tell you that it is not about religion, but the fact of the matter is that it is all about religion. It is a design by communal forces within the valley to completely Islamicise the valley by removing every symbol of Hinduism and other faiths from the valley.

Today, these communal forces are preventing the setting up of facilities for the yatra, tomorrow they will even go to the extent of banning the yatra altogether.

The land transfer fiasco has already consumed the Ghulam [Images] Nabi Azad-led Congress government and is on its way to now adversely damage the state’s economy. The fear psychosis has already resulted in a sharp decline of tourists to the valley. Counter-strikes and bandhs announced by the pro-land-transfer parties within the Jammu province have paralysed the life in that part of the state as well.

So far it has been a win-lose situation in favour of communal forces in the valley.

Let us take a hard look at the arguments presented by the locals who opposed the transfer of land:

1. The allotment would have adversely affected the environment around the area. One wonders where these tree-hugging environmentalists were when the same government allowed the felling of 10,000 forest trees to build the 89 km-long Mughal road.

40 hectares of land that was going to be used to provide temporary shelters and night-time facilities to pilgrims was in fact going to help in proper maintenance of the current day waste that actually pollutes the environment. But who can argue with senseless politicians who instigate people to come out on the streets?

2. The allotment is the government’s ploy to settle Hindus from outside the state to change the demographics of the valley. Look, who is talking! One has to only go back 18 years in the history and check who changed the demographics of the valley.

Islamic terrorists changed the demographics of the valley by ethnically cleansing Kashmiri Hindus from the valley. I wonder where these we-do-not-want-to-change-demographics-folks were when Kashmiri Hindus were slaughtered and the valley’s demographics were altered.

One would like to ask a few questions: a. Is 40 hectares of land enough to settle so many Hindus that it would change the demographics of the valley?

b. By putting this argument of demographic change, are the valley’s Muslims implying that Hindus are not welcome in the valley anymore? And I do not mean the Hindus from outside Kashmir. I mean the Hindus from the state of Jammu & Kashmir itself.

What if the Hindus, who hold the state subject certificate of J&K state and are legally allowed to purchase land in any part of the state want to purchase land in the area around the Holy Amarnath? Are the valley’s Muslims saying that those Hindus cannot buy the land there and settle down? Is that what they are implying? Are they trying to protect the environment by preventing the Hindus from settling in the valley?

Another argument Kashmiri Muslims present is that the land cannot be allotted to the Shrine Board because Article 370 does not allow anyone outside of J&K to own land. Their argument is that since the J&K governor is the chairman of the board and he is an outsider, this transfer of land is illegal.

How dumb does one have to be to understand that the land is transferred to the Shrine Board which is an institution based in the state of J&K and created by the J&K government. The land is not transferred to the chairman or the CEO of the board per se.

Having touched upon the outlandish arguments of those who oppose the allotment of land, let us look at some facts and the real story:

It was during the first three years of the Mufti Mohammad Sayeed-Ghulam Nabi Azad coalition government that the original proposal of land transfer was initiated and cleared. It was under Mufti Sayeed’s leadership that his forest minister Qazi Mohammad Afzal and law minister Muzzafar Hussain Baig originally cleared the proposal. It just so happened that due to red tape, the proposal was finally approved by the cabinet when Azad had taken over as chief minister during the second three-year part of the six-year term.

The same PDP led by Mufti Sayeed was originally okay with this proposal. But as soon as the PDP smelt that terrorist outfits like the Hizbul Mujahideen [Images] were not in favour of the allotment of land and realised that it could become a polarising issue to whip up sentiments to garner votes in the upcoming assembly election, it backtracked.

Since it is an election year, the National Conference and other smaller political parties would not let the PDP cash in on this opportunity alone. They jumped into the fray and whipped up sentiments by fooling the local Kashmiri Muslims. And that leaves the Congress. How could the Congress not try to cash in on this polarising issue in an election year?

Azad did not waste any time and revoked his cabinet’s decision to appease the Kashmiri Muslim vote bank. He did not just stop there. In addition to revoking his own order, he also effectively disbanded the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board. Now that is some level of appeasement! That is the real story behind the story.

It is an issue created by Mufti Sayeed to polarise the vote banks. It is his design of playing politics with the religious sentiments of lakhs of Hindus from all over the country.

Now that we know the real story behind the story, how about the Hindu pilgrims who want to visit the shrine and what about their fundamental rights to practice their religion with complete security, dignity and honour?

Isn’t it a shame that Hindus living in India, where 80 per cent of population is Hindu, cannot freely visit the shrine and expect better facilities? It is only in India that the majority community has to make all the sacrifices in favour of minorities because our politicians believe in appeasing Muslims at the cost of Hindus.

National Conference leader Omar Abdullah on a television debate on this issue asked why there is a need for land and new facilities when the pilgrimage has been going on for many years.

Does Omar Abdullah mean to say that there is no need to improve the facilities provided during the treacherous pilgrimage? Is he implying that if the yatris were okay for so many hundred years, then why change and improve the facilities?

I have never heard him say such things with regards to the Haj pilgrimage. Every year Muslims from Kashmir and the rest of the country want better facilities and subsidies for Haj pilgrims. But when it comes to providing better facilities to Shri Amarnath pilgrims, it becomes a sore point for Kashmiri Muslims and their leaders.

Heavy rains, snowstorms, landslides and hostile environment took away 256 lives during the yatra in 1996. And Omar Abdullah has the audacity to promote the status quo!

Some of you might argue that it was not the valley’s Muslims, but the political parties and terrorists who opposed the land transfer order and forced people to come out on the streets.

I can buy that argument, but that does not absolve the valley’s people from their responsibility? They cannot always support these fundamentalist forces and then at the same time claim innocence.

They did the same in 1989 and in the early 1990s when they either stood as mute spectators or as vocal supporters while Kashmiri Hindus were ethnically cleansed. As a good citizen, it is incumbent upon them to raise their voice against these dreaded forces and stop this madness.

If they sincerely believe in peace, then they need to stand up and reject these terrorist outfits and their masters. Conversely, if they don’t, then they are as much party to the madness as the principals and thus need to be held accountable.

Appeasement policies are never good for a nation, particularly for a nation like India that is so diverse in ethnicity and culture. Whether it is amending the Constitution during the Shah Bano case, releasing terrorists during the Rubaiya Sayeed kidnapping case, freeing dreaded terrorists during the IC-814 hijacking or continuing the temporary Constitutional provision of Article 370, all such policies will one day result in the nation’s doom.

It is incumbent upon the leaders of the nation as well as the citizenry to be on guard and not allow such appeasement policies to take effect in a nation that is based on the concept of secularism, democracy and fairness to one and all.

Lalit Koul is the President, Indo-American Kashmir Forum, a US-based advocacy group. He can be reached at editor@kashmirherald.com

Posted in Amarnath, Appeasement, Haj, India, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State, Terrorism | Leave a Comment »

Posted by jagoindia on August 14, 2008


J&K blockade staged by ISI to help Hurriyat?

14 Aug 2008, 0103 hrs IST, Vishwa Mohan,TNN

NEW DELHI: As the agitation in the Kashmir valley against a “non-existent” economic blockade continues, Pakistan’s intelligence agency, ISI, may be hoping to get through what it has failed to achieve all these years — project its loyalists in the Hurriyat Conference as the real representatives of the popular sentiments in the Valley.

The observation was made by senior intelligence officers during high-level meetings on Tuesday-Wednesday amid mounting evidence that Hurriyat was using the contrived complaint of ‘economic blockade’ to nudge the people to look towards Pakistan-controlled Muzaffarabad.

The home ministry on Wednesday released figures countering the claim of agitationists in the Valley about the economic blockade and arguing that truckers and unions of fruit growers openly aligned with Hurriyat were also engaged in myth-making about the blockade.

Claiming that there is no blockade at all along the Srinagar-Jammu highway, the ministry said as many as 236 trucks and tankers carrying oil, gas, sheep, medicines and poultry products crossed the Jawahar Tunnel from the Jammu side early on Wednesday morning. Of these, 82 trucks and tankers had reached Srinagar by afternoon, it said.

Referring to the stranded trucks in the Valley, an official said a fleet of them actually belonged to one individual known for his close affiliation with Hurriyat. The transporter refused to move his vehicles towards Jammu despite the promise of full security cover along the route.

Home ministry officials said that the decision of some of the fruit growers and truckers had more do with secessionist politics than any genuine security concern.

On Wednesday, home minister Shivraj Patil also told Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that there was no blockade on the Jammu-Srinagar highway and adequate security personnel were deployed for uninterrupted movement of vehicles.

The figures only confirm the suspicion that the blockade had been staged as part of ISI’s design to help Hurriyat occupy the space which had till now been occupied by political parties.

“It has long been one of the objectives of the ISI to project the Hurriyat as the true representative of the Kashmiris. Though it failed in the past, it now appears to have gained some ground towards it this time particularly when even the mainstream political party PDP became part of the design by joining Hurriyat’s ‘march to Muzaffarabad’ call,” said a senior home ministry official.

The official also pointed out how this episode has even brought two sections of the Hurriyat — the group of Mirwaiz Umer Farooq and the rebel faction led by Syed Ali Shah Geelani — together.

“The solution to the Amarnath land row may be arrived at sooner than later, but the matter which brought the Kashmiris on roads has relegated the efforts for normalcy in J&K to the background,” said the official, referring this to be the biggest worry of security and intelligence agencies.

The Jammu region has, however, a different problem. In view of the Shri Amarnathji Sangarsh Samiti’s decision to extend the shutdown till August 20, the home ministry asked the paramilitary force — deployed for providing security to the Amarnath pilgrims — not to leave the state even after the end of the yatra on August 16.

Sources in the CRPF said that all the 5,000 paramilitary personnel would be diverted to the Jammu region considering the extension of shutdown.

The Centre is, meanwhile, contemplating to announce an economic package for those who were affected due to the agitation in both the Jammu region and the Kashmir valley. The suggestion was given by the all-party delegation which met twice in the past two days.

Posted in Amarnath, Hurriyat, ISI, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State, Terrorism | Leave a Comment »

Jammu anger: Religious or regional?

Posted by jagoindia on August 12, 2008


Jammu anger: Religious or regional?
Supriya Sharma, Radhika Bordia

Tuesday, August 12, 2008, (Jammu)”The issue has taken 35 days, and still going on. My question is, why it took just seven days to resolve an issue in Kashmir while it’s not been resolved here. Isn’t it discrimination? Jammu is not being given adequate coverage, which it deserves. I want the nation to know what exactly the situation is, so people also know what’s happening here,” said Raghav Agarwal, Jammu resident.

Just outside Jammu airport this is the compelling appeal of a 20-year-old that Jammu’s voice be heard and heard right.

Across the country slogans like this on national television have convinced many that this is a religious movement, spearheaded by Hindutva groups battling over land for a Hindu shrine.

However, listen closely, there is more being expressed.

“They have always discriminated against Jammu. Jammu has a much bigger population than Srinagar, but we have less seats,” said a Jammu resident.

“This agitation is a reaction to the ill-treatment of Jammu,” said another Jammu resident.

And this isn’t simply the voice on the street.

“This time people of Jammu decided it was the end of it. They will not tolerate this type of treatment that we are considered as second class citizen,” said Jagdish Singh Jamwal, retired Major General.

“As a bar association member and a Jammu Muslim, I have taken a very strong decision to support the movement by the Sangharsh Samiti,” said Sheikh Shakeel, lawyer.

“The leadership has come up on its own. Forty different organizations have joined together and they are not political,” said General Jamwal.

“This is not a communal agitation. Firstly, when you focus on this religious issue, it happens to be the last straw that broke the camel’s back. And at the base of it all what is now coming out is actually a manifestation of grievances over issues that are rather secular in nature. You have a region that has suffered a lot,” said Dipankar Sengupta, Economist.

The current standoff may be totally unprecedented but observers of history say it fits entirely into a pattern, a pattern where the state has experienced the competitive pulls of the politics of religion and the politics of region.

The two often collapsing into each other perhaps because identities overlap. And so if the Valley is overwhelmingly Muslim Jammu predominantly Hindu but it isn’t that simple.

To understand the conflict it is important to understand the state’s topography, which very naturally divides the state into three distinct regions: Kashmir, Jammu and Ladakh.

Each of which has a unique demography.

If Muslims are concentrated in the Valley in Jammu they form 35 per cent of the population. In half of the six districts they outnumber Hindus.

But like Hindus, Muslims too are diverse by language and ethnicity. So if there are Kashmiri speaking Muslims, there are also Pahadi Muslims and in the plains of Jammu they speak Dogri.

In fact, the most celebrated Dogri singer is Muslim: Ghulam Mohammad.

Another distinct presence is that of tribes like Gujjars and Bakkarwals.

Nomadic shepherds, mostly Muslims, migrate between Jammu and Kashmir and are uniquely placed to observe the contrasts of both religion and region.

Here, in the mountains of Rajouri 100 kilometres outside Jammu, a family of Muslim Gujjars told NDTV that they support the agitation.

NDTV: The slogans make this seem like a Hindu-Muslim conflict. It’s being said that Hindu sentiments have been hurt. Sentiments of all have been hurt?

Gujjar Muslim Sentiments of all have been hurt. When the land was given once, why was it taken back?

They are powerful voices that reaffirm the regional colour of this upsurge. But then take a look at this:

There are reports that Gujjar huts have been targeted, a shocking reminder of the dangers of the protests turning communal. Something NDTV witnessed directly in Kalakot.

Here, as Friday prayers take place inside a Masjid, slogans outside swing from regional to provocative.

“All the money that comes from the Centre for the state goes to Kashmir. They don’t allow for the growth of Hindu or Dogra power,” said a Jammu protester.

NDTV: If there is regional discrimination, even Muslims here are affected. So why shout slogans that will intimidate them? Even Muslims here support this cause.

Jammu resident: Even Muslims here support this cause. We are against the discrimination faced by Jammu, whether it is the disparity in college seats or employment. But we are also against the attempts to give this agitation a communal colour.

NDTV: Do you feel fear?

Jammu Muslim: Yes, they were trying to provoke us with slogans, questioning our loyalty to the nation.

NDTV: As leader of the Sangharsh Samiti here, don’t you see it as your responsibility to ensure peace, especially at the time of prayers?

Naveen Chadha, local leader, Sangharsh Samiti I had gone away for lunch. When I returned I ensured everyone had quietened down. There has been no violence. Muslims here have nothing to fear.

We have lived together for years. Hindus have raised Muslim children, and vice versa. We don’t want any disturbance. We want this brotherhood to remain intact. Political parties, who want to grab votes, have created the issue.

Posted in Amarnath, Appeasement, Hindus, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State, Terrorism | 6 Comments »

Why Jammu is on the boil: Jammu in the shadow of the Valley

Posted by jagoindia on August 12, 2008


Jammu in the shadow of the Valley
Supriya Sharma, Radhika Bordia
Tuesday, August 12, 2008, (Jammu)

“An irresponsible government has tried to divide Jammu and Kashmir by creating a barrier, higher than the Pir Panjal range,” said veteran journalist Balraj Puris read masthead of his own article written in 1950.

It’s analysis as true today. History reminding us that the identity battles between Jammu and Kashmir is older than the nation.

If before Independence, Dogra rule meant the power base was Jammu, after independence, as Sheikh Abdullah became the state’s chief minister it signaled the shift of leadership.

Away from Jammu, power would be located in the Valley.

This sweep of Jammu city may have its own appeal but it can hardly compare with the famed beauty of the Dal vistas so romanticised in the national imagination.

This contrast deepens the sense of Jammu in the shadow of the Valley, a less tangible but significant dimension in accumulated grievance. Grievances, that people of Jammu feel finds no powerful voice.

“The other thing is the Kashmiri politician, be it mainstream or separatist, is far more savvy and articulate than his Jammu counterpart. There is a reason for it. Kashmiri politicians and Kashmiri masses have been politicised for a long time. They have had this history of agitation against the Maharajas, for very good reason, they were protesting against the system. Which was iniquitous and as a result of this system. You had a class, which was fairly articulate and was politicised. They were able to put across their views with a bit of articulation, which Jammu was not able to do so. And this class always had its listeners in Delhi,” said Dipankar Sengupta, Economist.

However, while TV debates may not be their forte, on home ground the people of Jammu argue their case well.

“Population at that time was equally balanced. But when the state Constitution was framed and state has its own commission. They were given 42 seats and Jammu was given 32 seats. There was difference of 10 seats. Then we raised hue and cry and four seats were raised in the Valley and five seats in Jammu. In the present population we have more than 32 lakh voters and Kashmir has 29 lakh voters. Kashmir has three Parliamentary seats, Jammu has two. So political power is retained by them and by that they discriminated in the employment in the whole of the Secretariat where more than 3,000 employees are there. There are hardly 3-4 of the Jammu regions, including Muslims. In the medical colleges, in the engineering colleges in employment, in development, every where there was a discrimination with the Jammu people,” said Leela Karan Sharma, leader, Amarnath Sangharsh Samiti.

Add to the resentment the impact of militancy. A younger generation in both Jammu and the Valley increasingly alienated from one another.

“See, I have seen both the phases: the pre-militancy phase and the post-militancy phase. Pre-militancy phase. Yes I can say so the bonds, which existed between the people of Kashmir and the people of Jammu they were intact. People of Kashmir used to come here doing the durbar move in winters and we had cordial ties. But what happened after militancy? During summers people of Jammu used to go to the Valley but this process stopped. Okay the Secretariat employees had to go, but the people in the summer holidays, they used to go there to spend their holidays. But that system that process stopped. Okay the youth that has grown up after 1990, okay they had no connection with the youth of Kashmir. So those bonds were fissured. The state which was together pre-1989, no longer together emotionally, psychologically,” said Luv Puri, journalist.

Amarnath land, then, as we are told repeatedly was just the trigger.

Hundred acres of land, handed over to the Amarnath Shrine Board for constructing temporary shelters for pilgrims, a decision arrived at after three years of careful negotiation.

But it exploded in the Valley as the Hurriyat twisted facts: It’s propaganda that the land had been given for permanent settlement.

For separatist groups, this was the perfect opportunity to get back into the headlines. The issue fuelled further by political parties.

In election year political parties stand to benefit by the polarisation of votes.

The PDP, part of the government, its ministers had initially endorsed the decision to give the land to the shrine did an instant and irresponsible turnaround.

As the land transfer was revoked handing back the land meant handing over on a platter to the BJP an issue that it tried its best to convert into a national agitation.

In Jammu the party decimated in last Assembly elections would attempt to lead the protests.

“For the people of Jammu a tragedy since the BJP initiative meant the movement would be stamped as communal,” said Professor Hari Om, spokesperson, state BJP.

The spokesperson of the Sangharsh Samiti might be a VHP man, but the intensity of protest showed people had come out spilling out on the streets of Jammu spontaneously.

“This is a people’s movement and so is not organised. People have just got together. The time of the protest is fixed. So people just pour out on the streets,” said a Samiti leader.

With the protest unrelenting, political survival meant every politician had to support it whatever be the stand of his party.

And so, Congress leader Raman Bhalla has been filming his own processions in support of the agitation.

And National Conference MLA Ajatshatru has declared support by placing ads in local papers.

As the schism between Jammu and the Valley deepens, thrown up in the process are the state’s oldest debates familiar words like restructuring and regional autonomy.

“Jammu needs a state Assembly of its own, and Kashmir should have its state Assembly. There should be some concurrent subjects, like a federal structure,” said Harsh Dev Singh, leader, J&K Panther’s Party.

But economist Dipankar Gupta brings the cool gaze of an outsider and argues that the need of the hour is Panchayati Raj.

“It is true that the National Conference government in 2000 had instituted Panchayati Raj bodies, who had carried out elections, but it was an insipid act, not much funds were given to these bodies. But the popular response to these bodies, the turnouts was very encouraging which showed that people had faith in these bodies. But it was an act and as it happens. The next government that came, the PDP-Congress government, left no stones unturned to torpedo even these weak institutions. So, the problem is the following: If the state accepted the 73rd and the 74th Amendment, then that would be a model act,” said Dipankar Sengupta, Economist, Jammu University.

“Now if you have a centralised governance, a particular province, in this case the province of Kashmir is overly-represented in the state legislature. It is discrimination. Real and perceived discrimination is bound to take place. And it has taken place. Now if it was a decentralised governance, and this state is a mountainous state, a multi-ethnic state and a diverse state, it cannot be in any way governed in a centralised manner. You have to have a democratic devolution of power, decentralisation in this state otherwise the state cannot run. That unfortunately is completely missing in this particular state. So you have various people, various regions, feeling alienated, feeling disempowered, blaming each other as well as the Central government for this current state of affairs,” added.

Posted in Amarnath, Appeasement, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State, Terrorism | Leave a Comment »

Haj Pilgrims Vs Amarnath Pilgrims – Must view video

Posted by jagoindia on August 10, 2008


Haj Pilgrims Vs Amarnath Pilgrims

Kashmiri Muslims Protest Against proposed facilities to Hindu Pligrims to Amarnath

from www.thekashmirwordpress.com

Posted in Amarnath, Haj, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State, Terrorism, Video | Leave a Comment »

Jammu’s Hindu intifada: Jammu’s Hindus will no longer tolerate oppression by Kashmir’s Muslims

Posted by jagoindia on August 7, 2008


“Years of neglect of Jammu by Kashmir has resulted in what you are seeing today. The people are frustrated. The Pandits have at last found a platform to vent their anger. Jammu has more people than Kashmir, but the lion’s share always goes to the valley,” says Professor Hari Om.

Jammu’s Hindu uprising
Kanchan Gupta, August 05, 2008

Jammu is burning. And as of now it appears unlikely that the rage sweeping through the entire province can be doused in the coming days. On Monday, the police, clueless as to how to handle the situation and directed by an inspector general of police who is an outsider, shot at protesters in Samba. They did not shoot to injure or scare away the crowds chanting slogans against Governor N N Vohra and waving the national tricolour. They shot to kill by aiming their guns at the protesters’ heads.
The brutal response of the administration and Vohra’s inability of to gauge the extent of popular disquiet and outrage have only strengthened the resolve of the protesters to continue with their agitation. The relentless bandh and blockade of highways has been extended by another five days. People continue to defy curfew and army pickets, pouring into the streets in hundreds, something unprecedented in India.

What we are witnessing in Jammu is a Hindu intifada: The young and old, men and women, youth and children are locked in an unequal battle with the police — and, since Friday, the army — demanding the immediate revocation of the government order cancelling the transfer of 800 kanals of land to the Sri Amarnath Shrine Board. The land was meant for creating temporary facilities for pilgrims who trek to the Amarnath shrine every year, braving inclement weather and jihadi attacks.

It’s been more than a month that the Hindus of Jammu have taken to the streets, burning tyres, taunting policemen, braving tear-gas and real bullets, violating curfew and blockading the highway to Srinagar [Images]. The images emanating from Jammu are eerily similar to those that emanated from Gaza and the West Bank during the Palestinian intifada. More tellingly, the tactics that have been adopted by the protesters are those that have often brought the Kashmir valley to a standstill. If you look at the photographs of the Hindu intifada, you will get a sense of how Jammu has decided to give Kashmir a taste of its own medicine — in this case it is Dum Dum Dawai (a public thrashing).

The details of the land transfer fiasco are well-known. The Congress-Peoples Democratic Party government headed by Ghulam [Images] Nabi Azad had instructed the forest department to transfer the land to the SASB. Within days Muslims in the Kashmir valley, led and instigated by pro-Pakistani separatists, took to the streets, insisting no land should be provided for pilgrim facilities.

The All-Parties Hurriyat Conference spread three canards: First, the transfer amounted to alienation of ‘Kashmiri land’; second, it would lead to intrusion of ‘Hindu culture’ in Muslim Kashmir; and, third, it would cause ecological damage.

Amarnath pilgrims deserve better
The PDP, sensing an opportunity to revive its pro-separatist — if not brazenly anti-India/anti-Hindu — image in the run-up to the assembly election in Jammu & Kashmir, joined the protest and subsequently withdrew from the government. To his credit, Azad stood firm and refused to budge from his government’s decision, till N N Vohra took over as governor, replacing Lieutenant General S K Sinha (retd).

Vohra, in his capacity as ex-officio chairman of the SASB, wrote a letter to Azad, returning the land and also offering to relinquish the board’s task of organising the annual yatra, thus making the pilgrimage to the Amarnath shrine subordinate to the valley’s Muslims �ber alle (above all) politics and Delhi’s equally odious politics of Muslim appeasement.

Vohra reportedly sent his letter to Azad at 8.30 pm on June 28. “The news of that abject surrender provoked an explosion of outrage across Jammu,” says a senior member of the Amarnath Yatra Sangharsh Samiti, a broad-based organisation without any political affiliation which is at the forefront of the protest.

“The governor has violated the SASB Act. He cannot act unilaterally. Any decision of the board has to be endorsed by at least five members,” says Professor Hari Om, academic and vice-president of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Jammu and Kashmir unit. “He is also in contempt of the high court which had passed an interim order approving the transfer of 800 kanals of land to the board in Baltal,” he adds.

For all his efforts to appease the Muslim protesters in the Kashmir valley by ‘returning’ the land that had been allotted for Hindu pilgrims, Vohra was unable to save the Congress-PDP government. The PDP pulled out from the ruling alliance on June 28; on July 1, Azad, obviously under mounting pressure from his party bosses in Delhi, reversed the earlier decision.

Meanwhile, in Jammu there was a spontaneous shutdown on June 30. “I don’t recall such a massive bandh in recent years,” says a lawyer who has been involved with the protest; he does not wish to be named, fearing harassment by authorities. Neither do the protesters wish to be identified because they fear they will be picked up from their homes by the police who take their instructions from Srinagar.

So, every morning, afternoon, evening and night, students, workers, professionals, senior citizens and housewives take to the streets, engaging the police in dogfights, hurling tear-gas shells back at their tormentors, chasing cops when they are outnumbered, retreating into narrow alleys when the men in uniform re-gather, and then surging out all over again. Their faces masked with handkerchiefs, they hurl stones; their eyes reflecting their rage. Scores have been shot and wounded; three of them have died; a young man was chased across rooftops by the police — he jumped to his death.

“Each death only makes us more determined. We are not going to be bullied by the valley anymore. Jammu wants a voice of its own. Jammu’s Hindus will no longer tolerate oppression by Kashmir’s Muslims,” says a young protester, still in his teens, from his house in downtown Jammu. His voice has just begun to crack.

The day after the June 30 bandh, Jammu flared up with street marches and protest rallies. The authorities responded by clamping curfew, in an effort to force people to remain indoors, till July 7. Women came out of their homes and dared the police to shoot them. An enduring image of the Hindu intifada is that of an aged woman, a Pandit who was forced out of the valley along with her family and three lakh other Pandits in the early days of jihadi terror, threatening a Kalashnikov-sporting policeman at a curfew picket with her tattered and torn slipper.

On July 7, the Congress-PDP government officially exited office; the next day the Sangharsh Samiti suspended its agitation, giving the governor a fortnight’s time to either have the land restored to the SASB or resign from office. “Vohra did neither. He only added fuel to the fire. He has been insensitive and his actions have only served to provoke the protesters,” says a senior official in the Jammu administration.

“Years of neglect of Jammu by Kashmir has resulted in what you are seeing today. The people are frustrated. The Pandits have at last found a platform to vent their anger. Jammu has more people than Kashmir, but the lion’s share always goes to the valley,” says Professor Hari Om.

Jammu province has 37 assembly seats and two Lok Sabha constituencies. The Kashmir valley has 46 assembly seats and elects three Lok Sabha members of Parliament. Of the 37 assembly constituencies in Jammu province, 25 have a Hindu majority population; the remaining 12 have a Muslim majority profile. “Our voice naturally gets drowned,” says an advocate who is a member of the Sangharsh Samiti.

The natural beneficiary of the Hindu intifada would be the BJP. It could end up sweeping all the Hindu majority seats in Jammu province and even emerge as the single-largest party in the next assembly. The Muslim vote in the valley would be divided between the National Conference and the PDP. The Congress could get wiped out — it has little to claim as support in the valley; following the intifada in Jammu, it can’t look forward to winning 15 seats in this province as it did in 2002.

This should have set alarm bells ringing at the Congress headquarters in Delhi. Strangely, the party’s ‘high command’ doesn’t seem to care. Or so it would seem from the near non-response to the protest.

Vohra and his patrons in Delhi have “clearly underestimated the determination of Jammu’s long-suffering Hindus who have had to cope with denial and deprivation for decades as the state government focuses only on the Kashmir valley,” the advocate- activist says.

This explains what happened on July 22. Kuldeep Raj Dogra, in his mid-30s, who was participating in a hunger strike at Jammu’s Parade Ground, decided to do something tragically dramatic: He consumed poison, stood up to read out a passionately patriotic poem he had penned, faltered and fell dead. “It was his way of registering his protest against Omar Abdullah’s speech in Parliament… he was incensed by the National Conference leader’s duplicity,” says Professor Hari Om.

The police panicked. They forcibly took away Dogra’s body to his hometown, Bisnah, 15 km from Jammu, and “tried to cremate it using old tyres, kerosene oil and liquor”, according to a Sangharsh Samiti leader. His widow Shilpi tried to prevent the cremation and raised a hue and cry. The police have been accused of “insulting, abusing and assaulting” Shilpi to silence her. But a huge crowd gathered and snatched Dogra’s body from the police. It was taken to Jammu and the situation subsequently just went out of control.

Since then, the Hindu intifada has gathered both force and speed. Curfew has been clamped on all of Jammu and Samba. The army has been called out. The governor has been virtually forced to remain confined within the Raj Bhavan by protesters who continue to gather at the gates in large numbers with every passing hour. Vohra’s ‘eight-point formula’, which included ‘allowing’ the SASB to ‘maintain infrastructure during the yatra period’, to end the deadlock, has been spurned. The Sangharsh Samiti is adamant that it will settle for nothing less than restoration of the 800 kanals of land to the SASB for Hindu pilgrims.

Just how determined the protesters are can be gauged from the manner in which thousands of them laid siege to the airport after hearing that Farooq Abdullah of the National Conference and PDP President Mehbooba Mufti were flying in. They had to be flown from the airport to Raj Bhavan in a helicopter after the protesters refused to let them through.

Since Friday night, the intifada has escalated and spread to virtually every corner of Jammu province. Protesters, defying curfew, have been relentlessly pouring out into the streets throughout the night, daring policemen and army personnel to shoot them. Two men were shot dead, 35 were injured when the police fired on protesters ransacking the district magistrate’s office in Samba. By mid-afternoon on Saturday, the intifada was truly raging in Jammu and beyond.

All trucks headed for Srinagar have been stopped by protesters at Samba and on the Jammu-Pathankot national highway. No trucks are being allowed to enter Jammu from Srinagar. Kashmir’s Muslims could yet get to know what it feels like to be at the receiving end of popular fury and mass anger, as opposed to the valley’s made-in-Pakistan rage.

Kanchan Gupta is associate editor, The Pioneer. He is based in New Delhi

Posted in Amarnath, Hindus, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State, Terrorism | 1 Comment »

The Centre is groping in the dark on the Jammu stir

Posted by jagoindia on August 6, 2008


Centre in bind on Jammu stir
6 Aug 2008,, M Saleem Pandit,TNN

JAMMU: As the agitation over revocation of forestland transfer to the Amarnath Shrine Board entered its 37th day
on Tuesday and the death toll mounted to 10, there was little hope of a quick end to the violence which has polarised the Hindu and Muslim communities in the terror-wracked state.

And to boot, it appears that the original protagonists of the campaign have let the reins slip from their hands. Sources said the intelligence bureau has informed the Union home ministry that the politicians who ignited the agitation in Jammu have lost control over the movement.

“The agitation has been taken over by the fanatic elements,” an intelligence officer said. The May 26 order was revoked following an eight day agitation in Kashmir valley where the land transfer move was dubbed by hardline Muslim groups as New Delhi’s attempt to change the “demography” of Kashmir by allotting land to a non-state subject.

The intensity of spontaneous protests was seen as a revival of 1990 situation and not only led to the fall of Ghulam Nabi Azad’s government but also united the warring factions of All Parties Hurriyat Conference, a conglomerate of 14 separatist groups in Kashmir valley.

The situation took ugly turn in Jammu when on July 1, Azad rescinded the order of May 26 to ease tension in Kashmir valley, failing to gauge the emotive impact on Hindu-majority Jammu. It is unlikely that after so many days, the BJP-led Amarnath Yatra Sangharsh Samiti, which is spearheading the protests, will settle for anything less than the full transfer of land for building facilities for pilgrims.

Samiti leaders started a dialogue with state authorities but pulled out after criticism from hardliner that they were “bowing to the Governor’s administration”. Now, Leela Karan Sharma, president of Samiti, says he will not
compromise.

The Centre is groping in the dark on how to calm the waves of violence that continue to rock Jammu over cancellation of the land allocation for Amarnath pilgrims, with reports of angry mobs lynching two cops at Jourian near Akhnoor on Tuesday.

The government’s latest attempt to douse the Jammu fire — an all-party meeting on Wednesday — looks unlikely to lead to any breakthrough with BJP strongly arguing that the agitationists banded under the Amarnath Yatra Sangharsh Samiti needed to be directly involved in any peace bid.

The government’s peace overtures have drawn a blank with violence escalating on Tuesday across Jammu and the funeral of two men, Sunny Padha and Sanjeev Singh, killed in police firing acting as a rallying point for tens of thousands of protesters. The death toll in Jammu and the Valley has risen to 10 in the past two weeks.

On Tuesday, protesters ripped out rail tracks, burned several government offices and prevented trucks carrying food, medicines and other provisions from moving up to Kashmir Valley. Three trains, including the 2471 Swaraj Express and 8101 Tata-Hatia Express, were halted at Kathua and Hiranagar by more than 6,000 protesters. Authorities had hoped that the anger would subside after the funerals. But despite the heavy use of police force and the presence of the army, agitationists have been far from deterred.

Even as the Centre groped for a solution, the situation in Jammu was reported as “grim” by a team of senior officials which visited the region. The attempts of the Congress leadership to get BJP on board so as to address the inflamed ‘‘Hindu’’ sentiments does not seem to have worked. Despite informal exchanges between Congress president Sonia Gandhi, foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee and BJP leader L K Advani, no progress has been possible. That the all-party meeting — an exercise involving JMM and DMK — could cover fresh ground looked highly unlikely.

While sending feelers to BJP, the ruling coalition tried the parallel tack as well — stepping up attacks by Congress leaders on the opposition party for inciting the anger over the Amarnath issue for its partisan ends.

This did not seem to have worked either. While BJP may have little incentive to come to Congress’s aid, there were also doubts whether it can use its leverage with the agitators to scale down their demand for the restoration of land.

The assessment that the agitationists are not really likely to respond to either party seems to be gaining ground. ‘‘We reject the all-party meeting. The PM should talk to people in Jammu and not to BJP alone, which is just a constituent of the samiti,’’ said Leela Karan Sharma, a Jammu lawyer who heads the Amarnath Yatra Sangharsh Samiti.

Posted in Amarnath, Appeasement, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, Terrorism, UPA | 1 Comment »

Jammu Hindu Protests – An Inside Story

Posted by jagoindia on August 6, 2008


Jammu Protests – An Inside Story
Vinay Dogra <vinaybdogra@…> wrote:
Images can have a profound impact and make a lasting impression even on the most cynical among us. They can also act as a force multiplier in a conflict zone. Recall the photographs and television footage of teenaged Palestinian boys in Gaza and the West Bank confronting Israeli tanks armed with no more than shepherd’s slings; of young men, their faces half-covered with handkerchiefs and kafiyeh, racing through billowing clouds of tear gas to hurl stones at soldiers armed with assault rifles; of middle-aged and old women violating police pickets and defying curfew. That was the first time we heard of a little-used Arabic word, intifada, which literally means to shake off but in recent times has come to mean a rebellion premised on the Biblical tale of David vanquishing Goliath, a relentless mass protest born of festering anger, deep-seated grievance and overwhelming, uncontrollable rage.

We are witnessing a similar intifada in Jammu province where young and old, men and women, are locked in an unequal battle with the police — and, since Friday, the Army — demanding the immediate revocation of the Government order cancelling the transfer of 800 kanals of land to the Sri Amarnath Shrine Board. The land was meant for creating temporary facilities for pilgrims who trek to the Amarnath shrine every year, braving inclement weather and jihadi attacks. This time, it’s a Hindu intifada, an outpouring of pent-up anger which has brought life in Jammu and other towns and villages in the province to a standstill.

It’s been more than a month that the Hindus of Jammu have taken to the streets, burning tyres, taunting policemen, braving tear gas and real bullets, violating curfew and blockading the highway to Srinagar. The images emanating from Jammu are eerily similar to those that emanated from Gaza and the West Bank during the Palestinian intifada. More tellingly, the tactics that have been adopted by the protesters are those that have often brought Kashmir Valley to a standstill. If you look at the photographs of the Hindu intifada, you will get a sense of how Jammu has decided to give Kashmir a taste of its own medicine — in this case it is Dum Dum dawai.

The details of the land transfer fiasco are well-known. The Congress-PDP Government headed by Mr Ghulam Nabi Azad had instructed the Forest Department to transfer the land to the SASB. Within days Muslims in the Kashmir Valley, led and instigated by pro-Pakistani separatists, took to the streets, insisting no land should be provided for pilgrim facilities. The All-Party Hurriyat Conference spread three canards: First, the transfer amounted to alienation of ‘Kashmiri land’; second, it would lead to intrusion of ‘Hindu culture’ in Muslim Kashmir; and, third, it would cause ecological damage.

The PDP, sensing an opportunity to revive its pro-separatist — if not brazenly anti-India/ anti-Hindu — image in the run-up to the Assembly election in Jammu & Kashmir, joined the protest and subsequently withdrew from the Government. To his credit, Mr Azad stood firm and refused to budge from his Government’s decision, till Mr NN Vohra took over as Governor, replacing Gen SK Sinha. Mr Vohra, in his capacity as ex-officio chairman of the SASB, wrote a letter to Mr Azad, returning the land and also offering to relinquish the board’s task of organising the annual yatra, thus making the pilgrimage to the Amarnath shrine subordinate to the Valley’s Muslims �ber alle politics and Delhi’s equally odious politics of Muslim appeasement.

Mr Vohra reportedly sent his letter to Mr Azad at 8.30 pm on June 28. “The news of that abject surrender provoked an explosion of outrage across Jammu,” says a senior member of the Amarnath Yatra Sangharsh Samiti, a broad-based organisation without any political affiliation which is at the forefront of the protest. “The Governor has violated the SASB Act. He cannot act unilaterally. Any decision of the board has to be endorsed by at least five members,” says Prof Hari Om, academic and activist. “He is also in contempt of the High Court which had passed an interim order approving the transfer of 800 kanals of land to the board in Baltal,” he adds.

For all his efforts to appease the Muslim protesters in Kashmir Valley by ‘returning’ the land that had been allotted for Hindu pilgrims, Mr Vohra was unable to save the Congress-PDP Government. The PDP pulled out from the ruling alliance on June 28; on July 1, Mr Azad, obviously under mounting pressure from his party bosses in Delhi, reversed the earlier decision.

Meanwhile, in Jammu there was a spontaneous shutdown on June 30. “I don’t recall such a massive bandh in recent years,” says a lawyer who has been involved with the protest; he does not wish to be named, fearing harassment by authorities. Neither do the protesters wish to be identified because they fear they will be picked up from their homes by the police who take their instructions from Srinagar.

So, every morning, afternoon, evening and night, students, workers, professionals, senior citizens and housewives take to the streets, engaging the police in dogfights, hurling tear gas shells back at their tormentors, chasing cops when they are outnumbered, retreating into narrow alleys when the men in uniform regather, and then surging out all over again. Their faces masked with handkerchiefs, they hurl stones; their eyes reflecting their rage. Scores have been shot and wounded; three of them have died; a young man was chased across rooftops by the police — he jumped to his death.

“Each death only makes us more determined. We are not going to be bullied by the Valley any more. Jammu wants a voice of its own. Jammu’s Hindus will no longer tolerate oppression by Kashmir’s Muslims,” says a young protester, still in his teens, from his house in downtown Jammu. His voice has just begun to crack.

The day after the June 30 bandh, Jammu flared up with street marches and protest rallies. The authorities responded by clamping curfew, in an effort to force people to remain indoors, till July 7. Women came out of their homes and dared the police to shoot them. An enduring image of the Hindu intifada is that of an aged woman, a Pandit who was forced out of the Valley along with her family and three lakh other Pandits in the early days of jihadi terror, threatening a Kalashnikov-sporting policeman at a curfew picket with her tattered and torn slipper.

On July 7, the Congress-PDP Government officially exited office; the next day the Sangharsh Samiti suspended its agitation, giving the Governor a fortnight’s time to either have the land restored to the SASB or resign from office. “Mr Vohra did neither. He only added fuel to the fire by telling some people who went to plead with him, ‘Why should I bother about Jammu? Does Jammu matter? Does Jammu exist?’ He has been insensitive and his actions have only served to provoke the protesters,” says a senior official in the Jammu administration.

“Years of neglect of Jammu by Kashmir has resulted in what you are seeing today. The people are frustrated. The Pandits have at last found a platform to vent their anger. Jammu has more people than Kashmir, but the lion’s share always goes to the Valley,” says Prof Hari Om.

Jammu province has 37 Assembly seats and two Lok Sabha constituencies. Kashmir Valley has 46 Assembly seats and elects three Lok Sabha MPs. Of the 37 Assembly constituencies in Jammu province, 25 have a Hindu-majority population; the remaining 12 have a Muslim-majority profile. “Our voice naturally gets drowned,” says an advocate who is a member of the Sangharsh Samiti.

The natural beneficiary of the Hindu intifada would be the BJP. It could end up sweeping all the Hindu-majority seats in Jammu province and even emerge as the single-largest party in the next Assembly. The Muslim vote in the Valley would be divided between the National Conference and the PDP. The Congress could get wiped out — it has little to claim as support in the Valley; following the intifada in Jammu, it can’t look forward to winning 15 seats in this province as it did in 2002.

This should have set alarm bells ringing at the Congress headquarters in Delhi. Strangely, the party’s ‘high command’ doesn’t seem to care. Or so it would seem from the near non-response to the protest.

Mr Vohra and his patrons in Delhi have “clearly underestimated the determination of Jammu’s long-suffering Hindus who have had to cope with denial and deprivation for decades as the State Government focuses only on the Kashmir Valley,” the advocate-activist says.

This explains what happened on July 22. Kuldeep Raj Dogra, in his mid-30s, who was participating in a hungerstrike at Jammu’s Parade Ground, decided to do something tragically dramatic: He consumed poison, stood up to read out a passionately patriotic poem he had penned, faltered and fell dead. “It was his way of registering his protest against Mr Omar Abdullah’s speech in Parliament … he was incensed by the National Conference leader’s duplicity,” says Prof Hari Om.

The police panicked. They forcibly took away Kuldeep’s body to his hometown, Bisnah, 15 km from Jammu, and “tried to cremate it using old tyres, kerosene oil and liquor”, according to a Sangharsh Samiti leader. Kuldeep’s widow, Shilpi, tried to prevent the cremation and raised a hue and cry. The police have been accused of “insulting, abusing and assaulting” Shilpi to silence her. But a huge crowd gathered and snatched Kuldeep’s body from the police. It was taken to Jammu and the situation subsequently just went out of control.

Since then, the Hindu intifada has gathered both force and speed. Curfew has been clamped on all of Jammu and Samba. The Army has been called out. The Governor has been virtually forced to remain confined within the Raj Bhavan by protesters who continue to gather at the gates in large numbers with every passing hour. Mr Vohra’s ‘eight-point formula’, which included “allowing” the SASB to “maintain infrastructure during the yatra period”, to end the deadlock, has been spurned. The Sangharsh Samiti is adamant that it will settle for nothing less than restoration of the 800 kanals of land to the SASB for Hindu pilgrims.

Just how determined the protesters are can be gauged from the manner in which thousands of them laid siege to the airport after hearing that Mr Farooq Abdullah of the National Conference and PDP president Mehbooba Mufti were flying in. They had to be flown from the airport to the Raj Bhavan in a helicopter after the protesters refused to let them through.

Since Friday night, the intifada has escalated and spread to virtually every corner of Jammu province. Protesters, defying curfew, have been relentlessly pouring out into the streets throughout the night, daring policemen and Army personnel to shoot them. Two men were shot dead, 35 were injured when the police fired on protesters ransacking the District Magistrate’s office in Samba. By mid-afternoon on Saturday, the intifada was truly raging in Jammu and beyond.

All trucks headed for Srinagar have been stopped by protesters at Samba and on the Jammu-Pathankot national highway. No trucks are being allowed to enter Jammu from Srinagar. Kashmir’s Muslims could yet get to know what it feels like to be at the receiving end of popular fury and mass anger, as opposed to the Valley’s made-in-Pakistan rage.

Posted in Amarnath, Hindus, Islamofascism, Jammu, Kashmir, State, Terrorism | 3 Comments »